Matt Flegenheimer and Alexander Burns

<h1>(News Analysis): This was the moment Joe Biden had to know would be coming. He did not seem entirely prepared.</h1>

About an hour into the debate Thursday, Sen. Kamala Harris, the African American former prosecutor from California, had edged into the cross talk with a request: “I would like to speak on the issue of race.”

Soon, her precise intention was clear. She paused and took a breath. “I’m going to now direct this at Vice President Biden,” she said, turning toward the 2020 primary front-runner who waxed nostalgic earlier this month about working with segregationist senators.

“I do not believe you are a racist,” she began. She had much more to say.

With that remark, Harris brought to the fore the central questions threatening Biden’s tenuous perch atop the polls.

Will the Democratic Party of 2020 — buoyed last year by the midterm success of a new generation of female and nonwhite candidates — really choose as its standard-bearer a center-left white man who joined the Senate during the Nixon administration? And if not, who will be the contender willing to challenge him most directly, with so many voters chiefly concerned about uniting to defeat President Donald Trump?

As Harris spoke, Biden’s head angled down, cocking to the left. He blinked repeatedly. He clutched both ends of the lectern like a flotation device.

Entering Thursday evening, Biden had subsisted as a peculiar kind of favorite: 76 and rusty, his speeches heavier on curious digression than stirring crescendo, unapologetic about his affection for a bygone era of comity. And that, to Harris, was precisely the problem.

“I also believe — and it is personal — and it was actually very hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country,” Harris said, pressing her open right hand into her lectern. She cast Biden as a figure rooted in an entirely different era, citing his past opposition to busing.

“There was a little girl in California who was a part of the second class to integrate her public schools and she was bused to school every day,” Harris said. “And that little girl was me.”

Biden responded alternately with defensiveness and indignation. “I did not praise racists,” he said, also accusing her of mischaracterizing his position on busing. “That is not true.”

But Biden’s political vintage quickly showed in his answer, as he noted that he had worked as a public defender after the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968. “I ran because of civil rights,” Biden said. “I continue to believe we need to make fundamental change.”

And after winding up for a longer defense of his record on race, Biden — the son of Scranton, Pennsylvania, who served beside the nation’s first black president — stopped abruptly, appearing to surrender the exchange. “Anyway,” he said, “my time is up.”

In this one episode, the debate seemed to capture the race’s key tensions as the campaign enters a new, more combative phase where Democratic candidates will more aggressively seek to establish a contrast in the sprawling field.

Biden loyalists used to think he could talk his way through anything, recalling his marathon town hall forums as a first-time presidential candidate in 1988 or his relative reputational Teflon amid verbal slips as Barack Obama’s vice president, like the time he got out ahead of his boss in endorsing same-sex marriage — and only endeared himself further to many in the party.

But the opening months of Biden’s campaign have often felt like an exercise in disaster avoidance, with a highly cautious principal and decidedly mixed results. His every utterance has risked further alienating a progressive base that distrusts him. His references are almost ostentatiously outdated. Even supporters are unlikely to cite his policy feats as the main attraction, preferring to dwell on his unpretentious bearing, his grace through personal tragedies and his time in the Obama White House.

Biden has lurched through uncomfortable explanations of the less-than-liberal moments in his record, despite largely avoiding extended interviews or unrehearsed settings. Even under gentle inquisition on “The View” in April, Biden strained to weather predictable turbulence as hosts asked about his treatment of Anita Hill at the 1991 confirmation hearings of Justice Clarence Thomas. At times, he was reduced to cutting himself off midsentence as he abandoned a line of defense.

The challenge for Biden entering Thursday evening was presenting himself as a figure in step with the times while turning his wealth of experience to his advantage. Often, he struggled. Boasting of his skill at winning concessions from Sen. Mitch McConnell, the immovable Republican majority leader, Biden suddenly found himself under fire from Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado, a mild-mannered moderate who depicted Biden’s deal-making as a fiasco.

Taking aim at Biden’s negotiation with McConnell to partly repeal a tax cut from the George W. Bush era, Bennet appraised the arrangement as “a great deal for Mitch McConnell.”

That negotiation with the majority leader took place relatively recently. But Biden has been in public life for more than 40 years, a history that provided ample opportunities for others onstage to make an implicit case for him to step aside. “As the youngest guy on the stage, I feel like I probably ought to contribute to the generational conversation,” Pete Buttigieg, the millennial mayor of South Bend, Indiana, interjected at one point.

Of course, Biden is not the only candidate who would be over 70 on Election Day. But the others atop the field, Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, have been at the vanguard of the party’s leftward tilt, sharpening their economic arguments to a fine point in recent years and making plain their urgency not just to remove and replace Trump but to address the root conditions that produced his election in the first place.

In a few important moments, Biden managed to jolt himself toward the future and outline a progressive agenda he would pursue as president. Having unveiled only a few signature proposals so far on the campaign trail, he pledged to take aggressive action to combat climate change and to reinforce the middle class with new benefits like an optional government health care plan.

It remains to be seen, however, whether Democratic voters will embrace as an exciting vision a package of ideas that represent, in aggregate, much of the unfinished business of the Obama administration.

Biden’s strategy has been to float above the fray, to the extent possible, projecting the aura of a capable statesman who could restore a measure of calm to the office after one Trumpian term.

As he took the debate stage for the first time this primary season, several rivals were unwilling to let him coast. Harris said near the beginning of the evening that America “does not want to witness a food fight,” although her exchange with Biden over race was the sharpest of the night.

But even lesser-known candidates recognized the value in taking on Biden by name.

“I was 6 years old when a presidential candidate came to the California Democratic convention and said it’s time to pass the torch to a new generation of Americans,” Eric Swalwell, a congressman and long-shot candidate, said at one point. “That candidate was then-Senator Joe Biden.”

Biden gave a little smile and theatrically narrowed his gaze.

“Would you like to sing a torch song?” a moderator, José Díaz-Balart, asked.

“I would,” Biden said, eyes widening. “I’m still holding onto that torch, I want to make it clear to you.”

The line landed to scattered applause. But here was Biden’s chance to nail the next beat, to make the case that his time had not passed. He opted instead for an unsteady recitation of a general education platform (highlighting the need to “make sure that everybody is better prepared to go onto education — for an education”) that concluded with this: “We can’t put people in the position where they aren’t able to go on and move on.”

This article originally appeared in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/politics/kamala-harris-biden-debate.html" link="null" target="_blank">The New York Times</a>.

Harris hits Biden where it hurts: his past

Soon, her precise intention was clear. She paused and took a breath. “I’m going to now direct this at Vice President Biden,” she said, turning toward the 2020 primary front-runner who waxed nostalgic earlier this month about working with segregationist senators.

With that remark, Harris brought to the fore the central questions of Biden’s tenuous hold on his status atop the polls.

“I also believe — and it is personal — and it was actually very hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country,” Harris said, pressing her open right hand into her lectern as she cast Biden as a figure rooted in an entirely different era, citing his past opposition to busing.

And midway through winding up for a longer defense of his record on race, Biden stopped abruptly, appearing to surrender the exchange. “Anyway,” he said, “my time is up.”

In this one episode, the debate seemed to capture the race’s key tensions as the campaign enters a new, more combative phase where Democratic voters will more aggressively seek to establish a contrast in the sprawling field.

But the opening months of Biden’s campaign have often felt like an exercise in disaster avoidance, with a highly cautious principal and decidedly mixed results. His every utterance has risked further alienating a progressive base that distrusts him. His references are almost ostentatiously outdated. Even supporters are unlikely to cite his policy feats as the primary attraction, preferring to dwell on his unpretentious bearing, his grace through personal tragedies and his time serving alongside Obama.

He has lurched through uncomfortable defenses of the less-than-liberal moments in his record, despite largely avoiding extended interviews or unrehearsed settings. Even under gentle inquisition on “The View” in April, Biden strained to weather predictable turbulence as hosts asked about his treatment of Anita Hill at the 1991 confirmation hearings of Justice Clarence Thomas. At times, he was reduced to cutting himself off midsentence as he abandoned a line of defense.

The question entering Thursday evening was whether Biden could present himself as a figure in step with the times while turning his lifetime of experience to his advantage. Often, he appeared to struggle. Boasting of his skill at winning concessions from Sen. Mitch McConnell, the immovable Republican majority leader, Biden suddenly found himself under fire from Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado, a mild-mannered moderate who depicted Biden’s deal-making as a fiasco.

With more than 40 years in public life, Biden has a long record that provided ample opportunities for others onstage to make an implicit case for him to step aside. “As the youngest guy on the stage, I feel like I probably ought to contribute to the generational conversation,” Pete Buttigieg, the millennial mayor of South Bend, Indiana, interjected at one point during cross talk.

As he took the debate stage for the first time this primary season, several rivals seemed unwilling to let him coast. Harris said at one point that America “does not want to witness a food fight,” although her exchange with Biden over race was the sharpest of the night.

Even lesser-known candidates recognized the value in taking on Biden explicitly.

The line landed to scattered applause. But here was Biden’s chance to nail the next beat, to make the case that his time had not passed. He opted instead for an unsteady recitation of a general education platform (we have to “make sure that everybody is better prepared to go onto education — for an education”) that concluded with this: “We can’t put people in the position where they aren’t able to go on and move on.”

Harris makes the case that Biden should pass the torch to her

<h1>It was a border-town stop for Beto O’Rourke’s Senate campaign, but another Democratic politician commanded particular attention: Gina Ortiz Jones, a history-making congressional candidate — gay, Filipina-American, an Iraq War veteran — hoping to turn a majority-Hispanic district blue. “Really special person,” O’Rourke said, as Jones stood and waved.</h1>

But soon, a county chairwoman posed an uncomfortable question. O’Rourke had not endorsed Jones. In fact, he had elevated her Republican opponent, Rep. Will Hurd, with frequent praise and, most memorably, a livestreamed bipartisan road trip that helped jump-start their midterm campaigns. Would O’Rourke support the Democrat?

“This is a place where my politics and my job and my commitment to this country come into conflict,” O’Rourke said. “I’m going to put country over party.”

Some supporters of Jones saw it differently: Beto O’Rourke was once again putting Beto O’Rourke first.

Five months later, as O’Rourke considers a run for president, his decision not to back Jones lays bare the go-it-alone streak that has defined his career, separating him from a modern Democratic Party that has prized near-uniform opposition to Republicans in Washington. While supporters view his above-the-fray message as the foundation of his appeal, he has left important Democratic constituencies wondering if he can be fully trusted as an ally.

“Beto-first politics,” said Jess Morales Rocketto, a Democratic operative who worked for Hillary Clinton in 2016. “He was concerned about Beto. I’m not sure he was concerned about building the future of Democratic politics.”

In Texas’ 23rd Congressional District, his choice was more than symbolic. Hurd won by fewer than 1,000 votes, and many voters and local activists hold O’Rourke — whose success helped lift down-ballot candidates across the state — largely responsible for Jones’ defeat.

“All I kept thinking was, wait, Beto is supposed to be helping us because he’s a Democrat,” said Rosey R. Abuabara, leader of TX-23 Indivisible, which worked to oust Hurd. “I really felt like Beto was just getting in my way.”

O’Rourke’s aides noted that his campaign — and its sprawling grassroots operation — had been enormously helpful to the party’s cause, sharing voter information with fellow Democrats, opening hundreds of campaign offices and inviting other candidates to speak at his well-attended events.

“Beto fully invested in building the future of Democratic politics across Texas,” his spokesman, Chris Evans, said in an email, adding that the campaign’s efforts would serve as a foundation “for all future Democratic campaigns in the state.”

Yet even some admirers of O’Rourke have struggled to reconcile the snub of Jones, particularly in a year when female and nonwhite candidates like her helped lift Democrats to a House majority. Though O’Rourke stayed neutral, Jones drew high-wattage help in the race, including from prominent Texas Democrats like Julián Castro, the former housing secretary who is running for president, and Wendy Davis, the former candidate for governor and abortion-rights activist.

Asked if O’Rourke had a special responsibility to support a female candidate of color in this Democratic moment, Davis sounded almost anguished.

“It’s really hard to say,” she said, adding that she did not mean to “back-seat drive” a friend’s decision-making. “I would feel that special duty. I personally would feel that. Beto’s not me, and I’m not Beto.”

O’Rourke’s very presence as a would-be presidential contender for 2020 is an issue of heated debate within the party. He is a prolific fundraiser who proved he can energize younger voters, and some early polls place him third behind Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders, well ahead of many more decorated politicians. But he is also a relatively inexperienced lawmaker who lost his Senate race against Ted Cruz.

For close watchers of O’Rourke’s rise, his approach to Jones’ contest captured the twin pillars of his political worldview: He has an instinct for performative campaigning, reaching for multiplatform connection to voters but often lurching toward extreme oversharing. (O’Rourke was widely mocked recently after turning the camera on his own dental appointment.)

And he has often defied the wishes of his fellow Democrats, especially traditional party leaders, who have eyed him warily since he challenged a Democratic incumbent in 2012 to reach Congress in the first place.

Through a fluke of weather, timing and internet trendsetting, Hurd sits at the intersection of it all. Until March 2017, he and O’Rourke had been friendly enough as district neighbors, but never especially close. Then, after a snowstorm grounded their flights from Texas to Washington, O’Rourke suggested they drive instead — and record themselves for all 1,600 miles, answering questions from followers along the way.

Alone in their rented Chevy Impala, they sang along to Willie Nelson, hashed out health care and trade policy and made a late-night doughnut run in Tennessee, attracting hundreds of thousands of viewers and wide-scale media coverage. Newt Gingrich called in to salute them. Mark Zuckerberg chimed in approvingly on Facebook.

“Our party leadership is probably not super excited that we’re doing this,” O’Rourke said at one point.

He was half right. Democrats in Washington, who had eyed Hurd’s seat as a prime pickup opportunity after Clinton carried the district in 2016, winced at the sight of O’Rourke bolstering Hurd’s reputation for bipartisanship. Republicans were delighted to have a high-profile showcase for Hurd’s personality and moderate image.

His congenial political brand helped him establish a consistent lead over Jones in private polling, giving pause to some national groups, like the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, about investing in the race.

“It was a huge boost for us,” Matt Gorman, communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee during the midterms, said of the road trip. “That thing went totally viral.”

Mark McKinnon, a veteran of Texas politics who was an adviser to George W. Bush, said by email that the road trip became a “life preserver for Hurd and launchpad for Beto.”

O’Rourke and his team seemed to recognize this. The ride registered as his campaign’s unofficial kickoff. And he was quick to invoke his relationship with Hurd, to deflect attacks from Cruz that he was too far left for Texas, and to burnish his self-styled standing as a high-minded antidote to the Capitol’s seemingly intransigent partisanship.

“I know how disappointing it is to people,” O’Rourke said in an interview last summer, explaining his decision not to support Jones. “It’s disappointing for very legitimate, really important reasons. Like, I also want to be in the majority.” He added that Jones would make an excellent congresswoman if elected.

Party officials and activists kept up the pressure, cornering him at rallies and fundraisers, including one in San Antonio where O’Rourke raised his right hand in a mock ceremony and pledged not to make Hurd “look cool” even as he refused to oppose him.

“Basically I told him he needed to dance with who brung him,” said Mary Bell Lockhart, chairwoman of the Brewster County Democratic Party. “And it was primarily Democrats.”

O’Rourke’s supporters insist he can be counted on to pursue Democratic priorities, while noting that his relationship with Hurd allowed the two to collaborate on shared causes like border policy. (Hurd has been a rare Republican opposing the construction of a wall.)

But O’Rourke’s history with the party is more complicated than it appeared in a binary race against Cruz, whom Democrats could generally agree to loathe. He was known in Washington for declining to pay dues to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. In 2016, he voted against Nancy Pelosi to lead the Democratic caucus, supporting Tim Ryan, a centrist from Ohio.

“We are all products of our environment,” said Pete Gallego, a former Democratic congressman who lost his seat to Hurd in 2014. “He has found tremendous success by shaking things up and by not being part of the party apparatus.”

After Jones won the Democratic nomination for the seat, she and O’Rourke had a cordial conversation by telephone. O’Rourke neither pledged to help Jones nor told her directly that he would be withholding his support, according to people briefed on the call.

In late June, Ronald Smith, a liberal activist in Hurd’s district, emailed O’Rourke’s campaign demanding to know: “Has Beto endorsed Gina Ortiz Jones? If not, when will he endorse her?” Smith said he wanted “a team player for my next Democratic senator.”

An O’Rourke campaign representative offered a noncommittal reply in an email reviewed by The New York Times: “We are evaluating some local and regional races at this time.”

By the summer, aides to O’Rourke had made clear to Jones’ campaign that he would not support her candidacy, three Democrats familiar with the exchange said. O’Rourke valued his relationship with Hurd and was mentioning it frequently on the campaign trail, as he sought to win crossover support from right-of-center voters.

Jones, who has said she is likely to run again in 2020, declined through an aide to be interviewed about O’Rourke.

O’Rourke’s defenders note that several Democrats benefited from his stronger-than-expected showing against Cruz, helping the party flip congressional seats in the Houston and Dallas areas.

But in no other swing district was O’Rourke’s allegiance in question. O’Rourke carried the 23rd District even as Hurd narrowly won re-election there. In the section of the district that spills into Bexar County, home to San Antonio, O’Rourke outperformed Cruz by about 3,900 votes, a review of precinct-level election results found. The same set of precincts voted for Hurd over Jones by nearly 4,700 votes. Hurd won the district by just over 900 votes.

“We know exactly what the Beto bump was and it was amazing,” said Smith, the liberal activist. “But my assessment was, for Democrats, as well as we did this last election cycle, we would have had one more seat if Beto had been on board with Gina Ortiz Jones.”

Democratic Pack Views O'Rourke as Lone Wolf

For a moment in August, an event hall in Texas teemed with hope, taquitos and unity.

Democratic pack views O'rourke as lone wolf

It was a border-town stop for Beto O’Rourke’s Senate campaign, but another Democratic politician commanded particular attention: Gina Ortiz Jones, a history-making congressional candidate — gay, Filipina-American, an Iraq War veteran — hoping to turn a majority-Hispanic district blue. “Really special person,” O’Rourke said, as Jones stood and waved.

This article originally appeared in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/us/politics/beto-orourke-democrats-president.html" id="5e889c36-ee91-3d23-aa7f-a3ac65965709">The New York Times</a>.

In Texas’s 23rd Congressional District, his choice was more than symbolic. Hurd won by fewer than 1,000 votes, and many voters and local activists hold O’Rourke — whose success helped lift down-ballot candidates across the state — largely responsible for Jones’ defeat.

Yet even some admirers of O’Rourke have struggled to reconcile the snub of Jones, particularly in a year when female and nonwhite candidates like her helped lift Democrats to a House majority. Though O’Rourke stayed neutral, Jones drew high-wattage help in the race, including from prominent Texas Democrats like Julián Castro, the former housing secretary who is preparing to run for president, and Wendy Davis, the former candidate for governor and abortion-rights activist.

His congenial political brand helped give him a consistent lead over Jones in private polling, giving pause to some national groups, like the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, about investing in the race.

As O'Rourke Weighs Run, Democrats Chafe at His Lone-Wolf Style

Politics

Local

World

News

Celebrities

Music

Movies

Entertainment

Sports 

Fashion

Beauty & Health

Relationships & Weddings

Food & Travel

Lifestyle

Domestic

International 

Business

About

Highlights

Selection Criteria

Jury

Terms And Conditions

FAQs

Pulse Influencer Awards

Courses

Careers

Explore categories

Read the latest news across entertainment, sports, business and more. Be first to receive exclusive updates with your free subscription straight to your phone. 